<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Don&#8217;t Have Anything Anyone Else Would Want</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/07/we-dont-have-anything-anyone-else-would-want/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/07/we-dont-have-anything-anyone-else-would-want/</link>
	<description>Information technology and security advice for small businesses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 16:41:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeus Botnet Self-Destructs &#171; Paradigm Consulting Co.</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/07/we-dont-have-anything-anyone-else-would-want/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeus Botnet Self-Destructs &#171; Paradigm Consulting Co.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 13:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=100#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] Paradigm Consulting Co. We make the &#8216;net&#8230; work!      &#171; We Don&#8217;t Have Anything Anyone Else Would Want [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paradigm Consulting Co. We make the &#8216;net&#8230; work!      &laquo; We Don&#8217;t Have Anything Anyone Else Would Want [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill McGonigle</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/07/we-dont-have-anything-anyone-else-would-want/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill McGonigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=100#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Right on.  Every Windows PC that&#039;s infested with malware is an involuntary proxy these days, and to think that every person who has such a PC is subject to a break-the-door-down police RAID is abhorrent.

The numbers are too high, the standard of evidence is too low.  At the most basic level, they&#039;ve criminalized installing stock-version Windows.  Wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on.  Every Windows PC that&#8217;s infested with malware is an involuntary proxy these days, and to think that every person who has such a PC is subject to a break-the-door-down police RAID is abhorrent.</p>
<p>The numbers are too high, the standard of evidence is too low.  At the most basic level, they&#8217;ve criminalized installing stock-version Windows.  Wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/07/we-dont-have-anything-anyone-else-would-want/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=100#comment-9</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting though, Peter, I&#039;ve actually read articles by established authors on their opinion on this, and some of them actually prefer to leave their wifi unsecured so that they&#039;ll be able to claim that someone else was using their network if something like this happens. In other words, they feel that if they do lock it down, and someone gets on it anyway, then they&#039;ll never be believed and they&#039;re hosed.

Personally I&#039;m of the &quot;encrypt your wifi&quot; camp myself, but it&#039;s interesting to see that the same problem (people stealing your wifi) can immediately polarize people as to the intelligent mode of preparation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting though, Peter, I&#8217;ve actually read articles by established authors on their opinion on this, and some of them actually prefer to leave their wifi unsecured so that they&#8217;ll be able to claim that someone else was using their network if something like this happens. In other words, they feel that if they do lock it down, and someone gets on it anyway, then they&#8217;ll never be believed and they&#8217;re hosed.</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;m of the &#8220;encrypt your wifi&#8221; camp myself, but it&#8217;s interesting to see that the same problem (people stealing your wifi) can immediately polarize people as to the intelligent mode of preparation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

