<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paradigm Consulting Co. &#187; Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/category/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com</link>
	<description>Information technology and security advice for small businesses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:36:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 2000 End of Life</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/07/13/windows-2000-end-of-life/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/07/13/windows-2000-end-of-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today marks the end of life (all forms of support) for Windows 2000 and Windows XP Service Pack 2.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today marks the end of life (all forms of support) for Windows 2000 and Windows XP Service Pack 2. This means that, while new threats and bugs will continue to be found in these operating systems for some time, they will receive no further updates from Microsoft.</p>
<p>If you are still running these at your business or at home, an upgrade is called for as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/07/13/windows-2000-end-of-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Dumps Windows (At Least, Unofficially)</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/06/04/google-dumps-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/06/04/google-dumps-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has decided to ditch Windows and move employees to Macintosh and Linux PCs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a title="Financial Times" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d2f3f04e-6ccf-11df-91c8-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">Financial Times article</a> reports that <a title="Google" href="http://google.com" target="_blank">Google</a>, without question one of the Internet&#8217;s strongest influences today, has decided to ditch Windows and move employees to Macintosh and Linux PCs. This move is reportedly largely due to the January hacks on Google and many other corporations, allegedly originating from China. Windows has a long-standing perceived history of having a worse security track record than its competition, and a large part of this comes because it&#8217;s simply the largest attack surface. Not surprisingly, the same thing that makes it the most widely developed-for platform for applications keeps it the highest profile target for malware and security exploits as well.</p>
<p>I applaud this move toward security and productivity. I don&#8217;t think it will be a easy task for Google, but I believe it will be worth the effort in the long run.</p>
<p>Does <strong>your</strong> company need to consider switching away from Windows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/06/04/google-dumps-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still Think You Want Those Admin Rights Over Your PC? Think Again.</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/10/still-think-you-want-those-admin-rights-over-your-pc-think-again/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/10/still-think-you-want-those-admin-rights-over-your-pc-think-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you missed a previous post or two on the topic of why end users should not have administrative rights over their PCs, BeyondTrust has released a very compelling report on this issue. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed a previous post or two on the topic of <a href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/14/why-you-do-not-want-administrative-rights-on-your-computer/">why end users should not have administrative rights over their PCs</a>, BeyondTrust has released a very compelling report on this issue. But first, let me ask the reader a few questions. <span id="more-367"></span></p>
<p>First off, what if I had a very simple security fix, requiring no new software to be purchased or installed, and with minimal configuration changes, that could block 64% of all Microsoft vulnerabilities reported  									in 2009? Would you be interested? What if I told you we had a fix that could also prevent 94% of Internet Explorer and 100% of Internet  									Explorer 8 vulnerabilities reported in 2009? How about blocking 100% of Microsoft Office vulnerabilities reported  									in 2009? Still not enough? How about blocking 90% of critical Windows 7 vulnerabilities reported  									to date?</p>
<p>As you should have guessed by now, <em>the fix for all of these </em>is the same: removing administrative rights from end users over their PCs.</p>
<p>While there are still some (poorly written) desktop applications which require administrative rights to run, I have found these to be relatively few in number these days, and once the initial configuration has been done, most programs run just fine as an ordinary user. Despite the additional configuration required by some programs, including hardware drivers, that needs to be done by an admin, the cost of setting these up the right way is generally far less than recovering from the damage caused by a serious malware outbreak.</p>
<p>The <a title="BeyondTrust report on Windows administrative rights" href="http://www.beyondtrust.com/PressReleases/2010_03_29_Windows_7.aspx?section=Press-Releases" target="_blank">press release</a> and the <a title="BeyondTrust report on Windows administrative rights" href="http://www.beyondtrust.com/downloads/whitepapers/documents/wp039_BeyondTrust_2009_Microsoft_Vulnerability_Analysis.pdf" target="_blank">complete report</a> are available from <a href="http://www.beyondtrust.com" target="_blank">BeyondTrust&#8217;s website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/10/still-think-you-want-those-admin-rights-over-your-pc-think-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Computers from Box Stores Don&#8217;t Save You Money</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/04/29/why-computers-from-box-stores-dont-save-you-money/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/04/29/why-computers-from-box-stores-dont-save-you-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott McGrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why should you pay $600-$1200 for a computer Paradigm quoted, when you can go into (BJ's/Walmart/Staples) and purchase a fully loaded computer for $350-$500?  A few reasons.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Why should you pay $600-$1200 for a computer we quoted, when you can go into (Best Buy/BJ&#8217;s/Walmart/Staples) and purchase a &#8220;fully loaded&#8221; computer for $350-$500?</div>
<div>Here are a few reasons:<span id="more-355"></span></div>
<ol>
<li>Warranty.  These computers generally come with a 1 year, limited manufacturer Warranty.  This means that if any part of the computer breaks after that, you can either &#8220;fix it yourself&#8221; (time and money) or replace the computer.  Unfortunately, the argument that &#8220;you can just go down and buy another computer&#8221; (money) is not really a good one, since you likely won&#8217;t be able to find an exact replacement, and will therefore have to set up the computer again from scratch (time).  When you spend a little money up front to purchase a computer we recommend, we make sure you get a 3 year business-class warranty, which includes free, on-site repair provided by the manufacturer (not Paradigm).</li>
<li>Compatibility.  These systems generally come with Windows XP Home, Vista Home Premium, or Windows 7 Home Ultimate.  These operating systems are not compatible with a Windows business network, not to mention other limitations that don&#8217;t belong in a business environment. An upgrade to XP Professional or Windows 7 Professional is an unaccounted for cost when you purchase one of these computers.</li>
<li>Standardization.  By purchasing a computer that we recommend, you will likely be able to take advantage of our familiarity with that particular product.  Often we will recommend a single line of computers to multiple customers, and in some cases it may even be one that we have deployed and tested in-house.  All computer models have &#8220;quirks&#8221; associated with them that make them unique, and knowing our way around them means more efficient deployment, maintenance, and troubleshooting- saving you money.</li>
<li>No Upsell. Most bog box store sales clerks are paid on commission. We&#8217;re not, and our margins are small. Paradigm has always been primarily a service entity, and the only things we sell to our clients are what they need.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/04/29/why-computers-from-box-stores-dont-save-you-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response to @Smallbizlady&#8217;s recent post &#8220;The Right Way To Make Sales Calls For Your Small Business&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/10/response-to-smallbizladys-recent-post-the-right-way-to-make-sales-calls-for-your-small-business/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/10/response-to-smallbizladys-recent-post-the-right-way-to-make-sales-calls-for-your-small-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read a post entitled ﻿&#8221;The Right Way To Make Sales Calls For Your Small Business.&#8221; This post outlines ten points which all make a lot of sense when making sales calls, except for number 7, where I disagree. ﻿﻿﻿&#8221;Do not leave a voicemail if you do not reach your sales target. Connections are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read a post entitled ﻿&#8221;<a title="The Right Way to Make Sales calls for Your Small Business" href="http://succeedasyourownboss.com/03/2010/the-right-way-to-make-sales-calls-for-your-small-business/" target="_blank">The Right Way To Make Sales Calls For Your Small Business</a>.&#8221; This post outlines ten points which all make a lot of sense when making sales calls, except for number 7, where I disagree.<span id="more-349"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>﻿﻿﻿&#8221;Do not leave a voicemail if you do not reach your sales target. Connections are only made with real people. Your message will be deleted anyway.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t follow. I leave voicemails. I don&#8217;t expect that my voicemail will close the sale, but <a href="http://blog.nikolaidis.com/2007/02/10/why-i-am-very-hard-to-reach-or-how-to-use-voicemail/" target="_self">to not leave a message when someone has put up a facility just for that seems silly to me</a>. I&#8217;d also supplement a call with an email, or vice versa, because some people are more responsive to some media than they are to others.</p>
<p>So, I agree on 9 out of 10 points. Keep up the good work, <a title="smallbizlady on twitter" href="http://twitter.com/smallbizlady" target="_blank">@smallbizlady</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/10/response-to-smallbizladys-recent-post-the-right-way-to-make-sales-calls-for-your-small-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Drops Internet Explorer (IE) 6. So Should You.</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/11/google-drops-internet-explorer-ie-6-so-should-you/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/11/google-drops-internet-explorer-ie-6-so-should-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, I received this in an email from Google: In order to continue to improve our products and deliver more sophisticated features and performance&#8230; we will be phasing out support for Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 as well as other older browsers that are not supported by their own manufacturers. It&#8217;s about time, and not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I received this in an email from Google:</p>
<blockquote><p>In order to continue to improve our products and deliver more sophisticated features and performance&#8230; we will be phasing out support for Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 as well as other older browsers that are not supported by their own manufacturers.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s about time, and not just for those reasons.<span id="more-332"></span></p>
<p>Internet Explorer is arguably the most insecure web browser in current use today. It&#8217;s very old, in Internet terms, and really needs to be replaced. If you are still using Internet Explorer, you need to upgrade to <a title="Internet Explorer" href="http://www.microsoft.com/ie" target="_blank">IE 7 or IE 8</a>, or switch to another browser like <a title="Mozilla Firefox" href="http://getfirefox.com" target="_blank">Mozilla Firefox</a> (currently at version 3.6), <a title="Google Chrome" href="http://google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome</a>, <a href="http://opera.com" target="_blank">Opera</a>, or <a title="Safari" href="http://apple.com/safari" target="_blank">Safari</a>.</p>
<p>If you are one of those unfortunate folks who are required to use Internet Explorer 6 for a legacy web application, contact your vendor immediately and tell them that they need to change their application to support newer browsers. There is no excuse for continuing to use Internet Explorer when<a title="Microsoft recommends upgrading from IE6" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=&quot;To+help+protect+our+customers%2C+we+recommend+that+all+customers+immediately+upgrade+to+Internet+Explorer+8.&quot;" target="_blank"> Microsoft itself has recommended that people discontinue its use</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/11/google-drops-internet-explorer-ie-6-so-should-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA Recommends Dedicated PC for Online Banking</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/22/aba-recommends-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/22/aba-recommends-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting & Bookkeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this month the American Bankers Association (ABA) has issued practical, simple advice which could dramatically enhance everyone's online banking security. And, I predict, it won't make any difference because people are unlikely to do it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month the <a title="American Bankers Association" href="http://www.aba.com/" target="_blank">American Bankers Association</a> (ABA) has issued practical, simple advice which could dramatically enhance everyone&#8217;s online banking security. And, I predict, it won&#8217;t make any difference because people are unlikely to do it.<span id="more-313"></span></p>
<p>The advice is to have a PC dedicated to online banking. If you weigh the convenience and cost savings of having access to online banking, versus time spent on the phone or traveling to and from a bank to conduct your business, the expense of a PC dedicated to this task, to continue to enable online banking, will likely be recouped within a matter of weeks, if not days.</p>
<p>The three arguments I&#8217;ve heard against this are:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>We don&#8217;t have enough money in the bank for anyone to want to hack it. </em>(Or, &#8220;<em>no one is interested in us because we&#8217;re too small.</em>&#8220;)<br />
Then it sounds like you have everything to lose! Isn&#8217;t it more important to protect what assets you have, regardless of size?</li>
<li><em>We&#8217;re protected by our bank&#8217;s security.</em><br />
No, you&#8217;re not. Bank websites get hacked frequently. Don&#8217;t believe me? Just do a <a title="Google search for &quot;bank website hacked&quot;" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=bank+website+hacked" target="_blank">Google search on the subject</a>. Furthermore, the banks are not required to refund your money! You do not have the same protections as you do with credit cards on bank accounts. Finally, it&#8217;s not usually the <em>bank</em> that gets hacked &#8211; it&#8217;s <em>your computer</em>.</li>
<li><em>We can&#8217;t afford the expense.</em><br />
The cost of a lightweight PC dedicated to this task is most likely lower than most of my clients&#8217; electric bill, heating bill, or liability insurance for one month. You <em>can</em> afford the cost. But can you afford getting hacked and having your assets drained?</li>
</ul>
<p>This is the <a href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/11/10/small-businesses-continue-to-lose-big/">same advice we gave on this blog</a> last year. It&#8217;s sound. It&#8217;s simple. It&#8217;s cheap. Get a new <a title="Netbook" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netbook" target="_blank">netbook</a> for a couple hundred dollars and use that for online banking. Is this not worth the risk of your business losing tens of thousands of dollars from its bank account? Please, if you do online banking at home or at work, at the very least, practice it from a non-Windows computer not running Internet Explorer. Better yet, prove me wrong and get a cheap PC and dedicate it to your online banking needs. Never go to any website other than your bank&#8217;s with it. Another alternative would be to boot from a live CD of your favorite Linux distribution, such as my favorite, <a title="Ubuntu" href="http://www.ubuntu.com" target="_blank">Ubuntu</a>.</p>
<p><strong>References</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lastwatchdog.com/american-bankers-associations-small-business-warning/" target="_blank">http://lastwatchdog.com/american-bankers-associations-small-business-warning/</a></li>
<li><a href="# http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/aba-recommends-using-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/" target="_blank">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/aba-recommends-using-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/</a></li>
<li><a href="    *  http://news.softpedia.com/news/Small-Businesses-Should-Conduct-Online-Banking-from-Dedicated-Computers-131086.shtml" target="_blank">http://news.softpedia.com/news/Small-Businesses-Should-Conduct-Online-Banking-from-Dedicated-Computers-131086.shtml</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sans.org/newsletters/newsbites/newsbites.php?vol=12&amp;issue=1#sID200" target="_blank">http://www.sans.org/newsletters/newsbites/newsbites.php?vol=12&amp;issue=1#sID200</a></li>
<li><a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2010/01/online-banking-precaution-for-small-and-mid-sized-businesses-draws-attention-/1?loc=interstitialskip" target="_blank">http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2010/01/online-banki<br />
ng-precaution-for-small-and-mid-sized-businesses-draws-attention-/1</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/01/01/Businesses-warned-about-online-banking/UPI-81761262329630/" target="_blank">http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/01/01/Businesses-warned-about-online-banking<br />
/UPI-81761262329630/</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/22/aba-recommends-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the Google/China Hack Means to You</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/17/what-the-googlechina-hack-means-to-you/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/17/what-the-googlechina-hack-means-to-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trusting Google does not just mean "trusting that Google won't do anything evil with my data." It also means "trusting Google will never make a mistake which accidentally opens my data up to anyone else."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friends and listeners to the <a title="Fresh Ubuntu Podcast" href="http://freshubuntu.org" target="_blank">Fresh Ubuntu Podcast</a> will know that I frequently raise concerns about <a title="Google" href="http://google.com" target="_blank">Google</a> and the information that it acquires about all of us. My concerns normally are along the lines of &#8220;just imagine what Google can do with all of that information.&#8221; However, I&#8217;ve never brought up what could be an even bigger concern: &#8220;What if <em>someone else</em> were to get a hold of all of that information?&#8221;<span id="more-306"></span></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume, for argument&#8217;s sake, that Google does abide by its own <a title="Google Code of Conduct: Don't be evil." href="http://investor.google.com/conduct.html" target="_blank">code of conduct</a> and isn&#8217;t evil. They&#8217;re still amassing a staggering amount of data about nearly every Internet user. Now, with more and more companies &#8220;<a title="Go Google campaign" href="http://www.Google.com/Apps-at-Work" target="_blank">Going Google</a>,&#8221; Google has access to data that it wouldn&#8217;t in the past. Now, they aren&#8217;t just indexing your website, blogs, or even chats and emails. Now they&#8217;re indexing your corporate <a title="Google Docs" href="http://docs.google.com" target="_blank">documents</a> &#8211; you know, the sensitive things you&#8217;re &#8220;not supposed to send via email?&#8221;</p>
<p>While I am quite confident in <a title="Google security" href="http://www.google.com/corporate/security.html" target="_blank">Google&#8217;s security capabilities</a>, no one is perfect. And like my aikido instructor used to say, there&#8217;s always someone stronger, or quicker than you. Last week, Google met its security match when their servers were hacked.</p>
<p>While I won&#8217;t delve into the economic and political issues which revolve around this hack (see footnotes for plenty of reference links), there are plenty of lessons we can take away from this:</p>
<ul>
<li>By most accounts, Google&#8217;s servers were hacked by good, old-fashioned social engineering:<br />
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Using a sophisticated spear-phishing campaign, the perpetrators included malicious links exploiting the bug in emails and instant messages sent to employees&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This means that the attackers were not hammering through firewalls or reprogramming routers &#8211; they had people <a title="Don't click on links in email" href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/04/10/security-tip-dont-click-on-links-and-dont-send-them-either/" target="_blank">click links</a> on what they thought were legitimate emails and exploited security flaws in common desktop software to gain access.</li>
<li>Users accounts which were hacked were most likely running with <a title="Why you do NOT want Administrative Rights over your PC" href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/14/why-you-do-not-want-administrative-rights-on-your-computer/">administrative privileges</a> over their desktop systems.</li>
<li>If Google can be hacked, anyone can. By extension, if your data is with Google, you can be hacked as well.</li>
<li>Trusting Google does not just mean &#8220;trusting that Google won&#8217;t do anything evil with my data.&#8221; It also means &#8220;trusting Google will never make a mistake which accidentally opens my data up to anyone else.&#8221;</li>
<li>Substitute the word &#8220;Google&#8221; with any popular online service or enterprise firm that has a lot of (your) data (e.g. <a title="Facebook" href="http://facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a>, <a title="Salesforce" href="http://salesforce.com" target="_blank">Salesforce</a>, <a title="Amazon" href="http://amazon.com" target="_blank">Amazon</a>). This is not a problem just with Google.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/">Researchers identify command servers behind Google attack</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/">Adobe Reader vuln hit with unusually advanced attack • The Register</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> IE zero-day used in Chinese cyber assault on 34 firms • The Register</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> Google may exit China after &#8216;highly targeted&#8217; attack • The Register</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9144138/Update_Google_may_pull_out_of_China_because_of_cyberattacks?taxonomyId=17" target="_blank">Google May Pull Out of China After Cyber Attack</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/13/world/asia/13beijing.html" target="_blank">NY Times Article on Google/China Hack</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> Official Google Blog: A new approach to China</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> China Defends Internet Censorship</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> Ballmer doesn&#8217;t get why Google is upset about attacks | Googling Google | ZDNet.com</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> US will complain to China about Google hacking • The Register</a></li>
<li><a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=7969" target="_blank">SANS Internet Storm Center Diary</a></li>
</ul>
<p>﻿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/17/what-the-googlechina-hack-means-to-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: I&#8217;m on Facebook &#8211; Now What???</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/12/25/book-review-im-on-facebook-now-what/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/12/25/book-review-im-on-facebook-now-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1600050956?ie=UTF8&#38;tag=nikolaidiscom-20&#38;linkCode=as2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=390957&#38;creativeASIN=1600050956">I'm on Facebook--Now What???: How to Get Personal, Business, and Professional Value from Facebook</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=nikolaidiscom-20&#38;l=as2&#38;o=1&#38;a=1600050956" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />. While the majority of this 100 page book was review for me, I would recommend it to anyone who is brand new to Facebook or social networking in general.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1600050956?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=nikolaidiscom-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=1600050956">I&#8217;m on Facebook&#8211;Now What???: How to Get Personal, Business, and Professional Value from Facebook</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=nikolaidiscom-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1600050956" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />. While the majority of this 100 page book was review for me, I would recommend it to anyone who is brand new to Facebook or social networking in general.</p>
<p><span id="more-297"></span>While the content is good, it is rather elementary, so if you are already familiar with Facebook, you&#8217;ll probably be better served by something else. I bought the book to see what sort of insight it would give for business applications, but I found the chapter on this topic to be short and not very enlightening. Also, I found the topics of privacy and security to be a bit lacking. The best advice they have is to not post anything that you wouldn&#8217;t want your grandma to see, because it may come back to haunt you. However, they also recommend you install lots of applications, without stressing that installing Facebook apps (of dubious nature) is a quick and easy way to get your account hacked.</p>
<p>While it was published nearly two years ago, the majority of the book is still up to date and current. However, some things have changed recently, especially with respect to default privacy settings, covered in the privacy chapter.</p>
<p>Also, the book is a little expensive, given its size. However, if you are just getting into social networking and Facebook, it does provide a good overall view of the service to newcomers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/12/25/book-review-im-on-facebook-now-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft: &#8220;Please Upgrade from Internet Explorer 6.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/12/21/microsoft-please-upgrade-from-internet-explorer-6/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/12/21/microsoft-please-upgrade-from-internet-explorer-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP will be supported until July 2010, the writing on the wall is fairly clear, and Microsoft is encouraging users to upgrade to IE 7 or IE 8.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP will be supported until July 2010, the writing on the wall is fairly clear, and Microsoft is encouraging users to upgrade to IE 7 or IE 8. Additionally, we have been recommending alternative browsers for years.<span id="more-295"></span> Like in the mid-90&#8242;s the browser wars are heating up, and you have several options to choose from when considering a browser for general web surfing. My personal favorite is <a title="Mozilla" href="http://www.mozilla.org" target="_blank">Mozilla</a> <a title="Firefox" href="http://getfirefox.com" target="_blank">Firefox</a>, which I use on Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux, but I regularly use <a title="Google Chrome" href="http://google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome</a> (mostly for accessing Google&#8217;s services) and <a title="Apple Inc." href="http://www.apple.com" target="_blank">Apple&#8217;s</a> <a title="Apple Safari" href="http://www.apple.com/safari" target="_blank">Safari</a> when on my Macintosh. I also use <a title="Opera browser" href="http://www.opera.com" target="_blank">Opera</a> from time to time, but it is different enough from most of the other mainstream browsers</p>
<p>If you have not yet looked at one of these other browsers, I strongly recommend you do. If you are wedded to Internet Explorer, then you should at least be on version 7, if not 8. Also, several of our clients have been told that they must use Internet Explorer for an application that they use which requires it. What&#8217;s shocking is that several of my clients have vendors who insist that they continue to use IE 6! This, despite the fact that it&#8217;s easily the least secure mainstream browser still available today. If you are unlucky enough to be in this group, I strongly recommend you put pressure on your vendors who are requiring IE 6, and tell them to  support current versions, or better yet, make their application less browser-specific so that it works with other platforms like Firefox, Chrome, Opera, and Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/12/21/microsoft-please-upgrade-from-internet-explorer-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
