<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paradigm Consulting Co. &#187; Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/category/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com</link>
	<description>Information technology and security advice for small businesses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:36:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Dumps Windows (At Least, Unofficially)</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/06/04/google-dumps-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/06/04/google-dumps-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has decided to ditch Windows and move employees to Macintosh and Linux PCs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a title="Financial Times" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d2f3f04e-6ccf-11df-91c8-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">Financial Times article</a> reports that <a title="Google" href="http://google.com" target="_blank">Google</a>, without question one of the Internet&#8217;s strongest influences today, has decided to ditch Windows and move employees to Macintosh and Linux PCs. This move is reportedly largely due to the January hacks on Google and many other corporations, allegedly originating from China. Windows has a long-standing perceived history of having a worse security track record than its competition, and a large part of this comes because it&#8217;s simply the largest attack surface. Not surprisingly, the same thing that makes it the most widely developed-for platform for applications keeps it the highest profile target for malware and security exploits as well.</p>
<p>I applaud this move toward security and productivity. I don&#8217;t think it will be a easy task for Google, but I believe it will be worth the effort in the long run.</p>
<p>Does <strong>your</strong> company need to consider switching away from Windows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/06/04/google-dumps-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Promises Better Privacy Controls &#8211; Again</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/25/facebook-promises-better-privacy-controls-again/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/25/facebook-promises-better-privacy-controls-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, Mark Zuckerberg wrote an article in the Washington Post addressing recent privacy concerns and promising better control over your privacy settings. I don't buy it. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/markzuckerberg">Mark Zuckerberg</a> wrote <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/23/AR2010052303828.html">an article in the Washington Post</a> addressing recent privacy concerns and promising better control over your privacy settings. I don&#8217;t buy it.</p>
<p><span id="more-378"></span>We&#8217;ve heard the same thing before. In 2007, when Facebook introduced <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_Beacon">Beacon</a>, there was a an outcry from the Facebook community. Facebook responded with the governance council, then, a couple of years later, introduced new and better privacy controls. The default setting for these? Everything was open to everyone. Who do they think they are fooling? Apparently about 400,000,000 of us Facebook users, that&#8217;s who.</p>
<p>Once again, due to a large public outcry, this time by a number of web-celebs who threatened to, or actually did, deactivate their Facebook accounts, Zuckerberg and company again responded, and promised to fix the issue. I can&#8217;t help but think this is like a bad relationship with a partner (Facebook) who, despite repeated promises, just can&#8217;t seem to keep promises or stop taking advantage of the other (you).</p>
<p>As always, assume that anything and everything you post to Facebook is public. Period. Forget &#8220;privacy settings&#8221; which give you a false sense of security. They can be changed at any time. Your personal information can be shared by Facebook (and other online services) any time they feel like it. They&#8217;ve done it before, and I&#8217;m convinced they&#8217;ll do it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/25/facebook-promises-better-privacy-controls-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safe Browsing Tip: Mozilla Plugin Check</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/24/safe-browsing-tip-mozilla-plugin-check/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/24/safe-browsing-tip-mozilla-plugin-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mozilla project recently expanded their popular and successful (and free) Plugin Check  service to support non-Mozilla browsers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mozilla project recently expanded their popular and successful (and free) <a title="Mozilla Plugin Check" href="http://mozilla.com/plugincheck" target="_blank">Plugin Check</a> service to support non-Mozilla browsers. So now, not only does this service, which scans your browser&#8217;s settings for outdated plugins, e.g., Adobe Flash Player, work with Firefox, but also with <a title="Opera" href="http://opera.com" target="_blank">Opera</a>, <a title="Google Chrome" href="http://google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome</a>, <a title="Apple Safari" href="http://apple.com/safari" target="_blank">Apple Safari</a>, and even, to a limited extent, <a href="http://microsoft.com/ie" target="_blank">Microsoft Internet Explorer</a>. Given that <a href="http://www.sans.org/top-cyber-security-risks/summary.php" target="_blank">unpatched client software, especially operating systems, browsers, and browser plugins, remain the top cyber-security concern</a> today, everyone should stop what they&#8217;re doing and go to <a href="http://mozilla.com/plugincheck" target="_blank">Mozilla Plugin Check</a> right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/24/safe-browsing-tip-mozilla-plugin-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malware Being Distributed by Mainstream Websites</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/29/malware-being-distributed-by-mainstream-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/29/malware-being-distributed-by-mainstream-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Half of the web is offering you malware. What can you do to keep yourself safe?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <a title="Yahoo, Google, Fox serve up malware in ads" href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/yahoo-fox-and-google-inadvertently-spread-malware-through-ads/" target="_blank">this article from Digital Trends</a>, some of the most popular websites on the Internet have been (unintentionally) serving up malware ia the ad networks that they subscribe to. <span id="more-351"></span></p>
<p>While these sites had no intention (or maybe even knowledge) of this, it goes to underscore a point that, while you may trust Google, Yahoo!, Fox, Facebook, eBay, etc., as trustworthy sites, the bulk of the content that these sites serve up is not coming from them &#8211; it&#8217;s coming from third parties, such as ad networks, which you don&#8217;t necessarily trust, or even know.</p>
<p>To protect yourself from this sort of attack, I recommend the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Limit unnecessary web surfing, especially at work and doubly so for machines and networks which handle sensitive information. If you don&#8217;t go to the site in the first place, you can&#8217;t get infected.</li>
<li>Make sure you are using a recent &#8220;alternative&#8221; browser, such as Firefox or Chrome. While this is no guarantee of safety, Internet Explorer is still the main target for browser-based attacks. Using an alternative platform may lower this risk by lowering your profile.</li>
<li>Run extensions such as Adblock Plus and NoScript. These disable active programming on websites by default. Note: This does mean more work for you, as the bulk of websites you hit will not work until you enable the scripting components on the pages. However, you are much, much safer from this type of attack.</li>
<li>Keep your operating system and all other software on your computer patched and up to date. Many of these sorts of attacks rely on flaws in software installed on your computer. If the flaws are patched, then you are less vulnerable to the attack.</li>
<li>Know what your anti-malware program and operating system alerts look like. Many of these &#8220;drive by downloads&#8221; rely on tricking the user into installing malware by popping up fake notices telling them that their system is infected, and needs to be scanned. What they are really doing is tricking the user into running the malware in the first place! Don&#8217;t be fooled! Learn what your software really is likely to say in the event of malware detection, and how to respond appropriately. If you have any questions, contact your IT staff before taking any action, including clicking on links or closing windows.</li>
<li>As always, <a title="Why you do NOT want admin rights on your PC." href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/14/why-you-do-not-want-administrative-rights-on-your-computer/" target="_blank">drop those admin rights</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/29/malware-being-distributed-by-mainstream-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Drops Internet Explorer (IE) 6. So Should You.</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/11/google-drops-internet-explorer-ie-6-so-should-you/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/11/google-drops-internet-explorer-ie-6-so-should-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, I received this in an email from Google: In order to continue to improve our products and deliver more sophisticated features and performance&#8230; we will be phasing out support for Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 as well as other older browsers that are not supported by their own manufacturers. It&#8217;s about time, and not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I received this in an email from Google:</p>
<blockquote><p>In order to continue to improve our products and deliver more sophisticated features and performance&#8230; we will be phasing out support for Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 as well as other older browsers that are not supported by their own manufacturers.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s about time, and not just for those reasons.<span id="more-332"></span></p>
<p>Internet Explorer is arguably the most insecure web browser in current use today. It&#8217;s very old, in Internet terms, and really needs to be replaced. If you are still using Internet Explorer, you need to upgrade to <a title="Internet Explorer" href="http://www.microsoft.com/ie" target="_blank">IE 7 or IE 8</a>, or switch to another browser like <a title="Mozilla Firefox" href="http://getfirefox.com" target="_blank">Mozilla Firefox</a> (currently at version 3.6), <a title="Google Chrome" href="http://google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome</a>, <a href="http://opera.com" target="_blank">Opera</a>, or <a title="Safari" href="http://apple.com/safari" target="_blank">Safari</a>.</p>
<p>If you are one of those unfortunate folks who are required to use Internet Explorer 6 for a legacy web application, contact your vendor immediately and tell them that they need to change their application to support newer browsers. There is no excuse for continuing to use Internet Explorer when<a title="Microsoft recommends upgrading from IE6" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=&quot;To+help+protect+our+customers%2C+we+recommend+that+all+customers+immediately+upgrade+to+Internet+Explorer+8.&quot;" target="_blank"> Microsoft itself has recommended that people discontinue its use</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/11/google-drops-internet-explorer-ie-6-so-should-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA Recommends Dedicated PC for Online Banking</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/22/aba-recommends-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/22/aba-recommends-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting & Bookkeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this month the American Bankers Association (ABA) has issued practical, simple advice which could dramatically enhance everyone's online banking security. And, I predict, it won't make any difference because people are unlikely to do it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month the <a title="American Bankers Association" href="http://www.aba.com/" target="_blank">American Bankers Association</a> (ABA) has issued practical, simple advice which could dramatically enhance everyone&#8217;s online banking security. And, I predict, it won&#8217;t make any difference because people are unlikely to do it.<span id="more-313"></span></p>
<p>The advice is to have a PC dedicated to online banking. If you weigh the convenience and cost savings of having access to online banking, versus time spent on the phone or traveling to and from a bank to conduct your business, the expense of a PC dedicated to this task, to continue to enable online banking, will likely be recouped within a matter of weeks, if not days.</p>
<p>The three arguments I&#8217;ve heard against this are:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>We don&#8217;t have enough money in the bank for anyone to want to hack it. </em>(Or, &#8220;<em>no one is interested in us because we&#8217;re too small.</em>&#8220;)<br />
Then it sounds like you have everything to lose! Isn&#8217;t it more important to protect what assets you have, regardless of size?</li>
<li><em>We&#8217;re protected by our bank&#8217;s security.</em><br />
No, you&#8217;re not. Bank websites get hacked frequently. Don&#8217;t believe me? Just do a <a title="Google search for &quot;bank website hacked&quot;" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=bank+website+hacked" target="_blank">Google search on the subject</a>. Furthermore, the banks are not required to refund your money! You do not have the same protections as you do with credit cards on bank accounts. Finally, it&#8217;s not usually the <em>bank</em> that gets hacked &#8211; it&#8217;s <em>your computer</em>.</li>
<li><em>We can&#8217;t afford the expense.</em><br />
The cost of a lightweight PC dedicated to this task is most likely lower than most of my clients&#8217; electric bill, heating bill, or liability insurance for one month. You <em>can</em> afford the cost. But can you afford getting hacked and having your assets drained?</li>
</ul>
<p>This is the <a href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/11/10/small-businesses-continue-to-lose-big/">same advice we gave on this blog</a> last year. It&#8217;s sound. It&#8217;s simple. It&#8217;s cheap. Get a new <a title="Netbook" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netbook" target="_blank">netbook</a> for a couple hundred dollars and use that for online banking. Is this not worth the risk of your business losing tens of thousands of dollars from its bank account? Please, if you do online banking at home or at work, at the very least, practice it from a non-Windows computer not running Internet Explorer. Better yet, prove me wrong and get a cheap PC and dedicate it to your online banking needs. Never go to any website other than your bank&#8217;s with it. Another alternative would be to boot from a live CD of your favorite Linux distribution, such as my favorite, <a title="Ubuntu" href="http://www.ubuntu.com" target="_blank">Ubuntu</a>.</p>
<p><strong>References</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lastwatchdog.com/american-bankers-associations-small-business-warning/" target="_blank">http://lastwatchdog.com/american-bankers-associations-small-business-warning/</a></li>
<li><a href="# http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/aba-recommends-using-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/" target="_blank">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/aba-recommends-using-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/</a></li>
<li><a href="    *  http://news.softpedia.com/news/Small-Businesses-Should-Conduct-Online-Banking-from-Dedicated-Computers-131086.shtml" target="_blank">http://news.softpedia.com/news/Small-Businesses-Should-Conduct-Online-Banking-from-Dedicated-Computers-131086.shtml</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sans.org/newsletters/newsbites/newsbites.php?vol=12&amp;issue=1#sID200" target="_blank">http://www.sans.org/newsletters/newsbites/newsbites.php?vol=12&amp;issue=1#sID200</a></li>
<li><a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2010/01/online-banking-precaution-for-small-and-mid-sized-businesses-draws-attention-/1?loc=interstitialskip" target="_blank">http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2010/01/online-banki<br />
ng-precaution-for-small-and-mid-sized-businesses-draws-attention-/1</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/01/01/Businesses-warned-about-online-banking/UPI-81761262329630/" target="_blank">http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/01/01/Businesses-warned-about-online-banking<br />
/UPI-81761262329630/</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/22/aba-recommends-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the Google/China Hack Means to You</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/17/what-the-googlechina-hack-means-to-you/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/17/what-the-googlechina-hack-means-to-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trusting Google does not just mean "trusting that Google won't do anything evil with my data." It also means "trusting Google will never make a mistake which accidentally opens my data up to anyone else."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friends and listeners to the <a title="Fresh Ubuntu Podcast" href="http://freshubuntu.org" target="_blank">Fresh Ubuntu Podcast</a> will know that I frequently raise concerns about <a title="Google" href="http://google.com" target="_blank">Google</a> and the information that it acquires about all of us. My concerns normally are along the lines of &#8220;just imagine what Google can do with all of that information.&#8221; However, I&#8217;ve never brought up what could be an even bigger concern: &#8220;What if <em>someone else</em> were to get a hold of all of that information?&#8221;<span id="more-306"></span></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume, for argument&#8217;s sake, that Google does abide by its own <a title="Google Code of Conduct: Don't be evil." href="http://investor.google.com/conduct.html" target="_blank">code of conduct</a> and isn&#8217;t evil. They&#8217;re still amassing a staggering amount of data about nearly every Internet user. Now, with more and more companies &#8220;<a title="Go Google campaign" href="http://www.Google.com/Apps-at-Work" target="_blank">Going Google</a>,&#8221; Google has access to data that it wouldn&#8217;t in the past. Now, they aren&#8217;t just indexing your website, blogs, or even chats and emails. Now they&#8217;re indexing your corporate <a title="Google Docs" href="http://docs.google.com" target="_blank">documents</a> &#8211; you know, the sensitive things you&#8217;re &#8220;not supposed to send via email?&#8221;</p>
<p>While I am quite confident in <a title="Google security" href="http://www.google.com/corporate/security.html" target="_blank">Google&#8217;s security capabilities</a>, no one is perfect. And like my aikido instructor used to say, there&#8217;s always someone stronger, or quicker than you. Last week, Google met its security match when their servers were hacked.</p>
<p>While I won&#8217;t delve into the economic and political issues which revolve around this hack (see footnotes for plenty of reference links), there are plenty of lessons we can take away from this:</p>
<ul>
<li>By most accounts, Google&#8217;s servers were hacked by good, old-fashioned social engineering:<br />
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Using a sophisticated spear-phishing campaign, the perpetrators included malicious links exploiting the bug in emails and instant messages sent to employees&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This means that the attackers were not hammering through firewalls or reprogramming routers &#8211; they had people <a title="Don't click on links in email" href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/04/10/security-tip-dont-click-on-links-and-dont-send-them-either/" target="_blank">click links</a> on what they thought were legitimate emails and exploited security flaws in common desktop software to gain access.</li>
<li>Users accounts which were hacked were most likely running with <a title="Why you do NOT want Administrative Rights over your PC" href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/14/why-you-do-not-want-administrative-rights-on-your-computer/">administrative privileges</a> over their desktop systems.</li>
<li>If Google can be hacked, anyone can. By extension, if your data is with Google, you can be hacked as well.</li>
<li>Trusting Google does not just mean &#8220;trusting that Google won&#8217;t do anything evil with my data.&#8221; It also means &#8220;trusting Google will never make a mistake which accidentally opens my data up to anyone else.&#8221;</li>
<li>Substitute the word &#8220;Google&#8221; with any popular online service or enterprise firm that has a lot of (your) data (e.g. <a title="Facebook" href="http://facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a>, <a title="Salesforce" href="http://salesforce.com" target="_blank">Salesforce</a>, <a title="Amazon" href="http://amazon.com" target="_blank">Amazon</a>). This is not a problem just with Google.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/">Researchers identify command servers behind Google attack</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/">Adobe Reader vuln hit with unusually advanced attack • The Register</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> IE zero-day used in Chinese cyber assault on 34 firms • The Register</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> Google may exit China after &#8216;highly targeted&#8217; attack • The Register</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9144138/Update_Google_may_pull_out_of_China_because_of_cyberattacks?taxonomyId=17" target="_blank">Google May Pull Out of China After Cyber Attack</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/13/world/asia/13beijing.html" target="_blank">NY Times Article on Google/China Hack</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> Official Google Blog: A new approach to China</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> China Defends Internet Censorship</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> Ballmer doesn&#8217;t get why Google is upset about attacks | Googling Google | ZDNet.com</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> US will complain to China about Google hacking • The Register</a></li>
<li><a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=7969" target="_blank">SANS Internet Storm Center Diary</a></li>
</ul>
<p>﻿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/17/what-the-googlechina-hack-means-to-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Bans Common Passwords</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/12/twitter-bans-common-passwords/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/12/twitter-bans-common-passwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter recently published a list of 369 banned passwords which it will no longer accept on Twitter accounts. Regardless of whether or not you use Twitter, it is worth a minute or two to skim this list and see if you are using one of these passwords, on any system, or something similar, which could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter recently published a list of 369 banned passwords which it will no longer accept on Twitter accounts. Regardless of whether or not you use Twitter, it is worth a minute or two to skim this list and see if you are using one of these passwords, on any system, or something similar, which could lead to an account compromise.<span id="more-301"></span></p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">111111<br />
11111111<br />
112233<br />
121212<br />
123123<br />
123456<br />
1234567<br />
12345678<br />
131313<br />
232323<br />
654321<br />
666666<br />
696969<br />
777777<br />
7777777<br />
8675309<br />
987654<br />
aaaaaa<br />
abc123<br />
abc123<br />
abcdef<br />
abgrtyu<br />
access<br />
access14<br />
action<br />
albert<br />
alexis<br />
amanda<br />
amateur<br />
andrea<br />
andrew<br />
angela<br />
angels<br />
animal<br />
anthony<br />
apollo<br />
apples<br />
arsenal<br />
arthur<br />
asdfgh<br />
asdfgh<br />
ashley<br />
august<br />
austin<br />
badboy<br />
bailey<br />
banana<br />
barney<br />
baseball<br />
batman<br />
beaver<br />
beavis<br />
bigdaddy<br />
bigdog<br />
birdie<br />
bitches<br />
biteme<br />
blazer<br />
blonde<br />
blondes<br />
bond007<br />
bonnie<br />
booboo<br />
booger<br />
boomer<br />
boston<br />
brandon<br />
brandy<br />
braves<br />
brazil<br />
bronco<br />
broncos</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">bulldog<br />
buster<br />
butter<br />
butthead<br />
calvin<br />
camaro<br />
cameron<br />
canada<br />
captain<br />
carlos<br />
carter<br />
casper<br />
charles<br />
charlie<br />
cheese<br />
chelsea<br />
chester<br />
chicago<br />
chicken<br />
cocacola<br />
coffee<br />
college<br />
compaq<br />
computer<br />
cookie<br />
cooper<br />
corvette<br />
cowboy<br />
cowboys<br />
crystal<br />
dakota<br />
dallas<br />
daniel<br />
danielle<br />
debbie<br />
dennis<br />
diablo<br />
diamond<br />
doctor<br />
doggie<br />
dolphin<br />
dolphins<br />
donald<br />
dragon<br />
dreams<br />
driver<br />
eagle1<br />
eagles<br />
edward<br />
einstein<br />
erotic<br />
extreme<br />
falcon<br />
fender<br />
ferrari<br />
firebird<br />
fishing<br />
florida<br />
flower<br />
flyers<br />
football<br />
forever<br />
freddy<br />
freedom<br />
gandalf<br />
gateway<br />
gators<br />
gemini<br />
george<br />
giants<br />
ginger<br />
golden<br />
golfer</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">gordon<br />
gregory<br />
guitar<br />
gunner<br />
hammer<br />
hannah<br />
hardcore<br />
harley<br />
heather<br />
helpme<br />
hockey<br />
hooters<br />
horney<br />
hotdog<br />
hunter<br />
hunting<br />
iceman<br />
iloveyou<br />
internet<br />
iwantu<br />
jackie<br />
jackson<br />
jaguar<br />
jasmine<br />
jasper<br />
jennifer<br />
jeremy<br />
jessica<br />
johnny<br />
johnson<br />
jordan<br />
joseph<br />
joshua<br />
junior<br />
justin<br />
killer<br />
knight<br />
ladies<br />
lakers<br />
lauren<br />
leather<br />
legend<br />
letmein<br />
little<br />
london<br />
lovers<br />
maddog<br />
madison<br />
maggie<br />
magnum<br />
marine<br />
marlboro<br />
martin<br />
marvin<br />
master<br />
matrix<br />
matthew<br />
maverick<br />
maxwell<br />
melissa<br />
member<br />
mercedes<br />
merlin<br />
michael<br />
michelle<br />
mickey<br />
midnight<br />
miller<br />
mistress<br />
monica<br />
monkey<br />
monkey</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">monster<br />
morgan<br />
mother<br />
mountain<br />
muffin<br />
murphy<br />
mustang<br />
naked<br />
nascar<br />
nathan<br />
naughty<br />
ncc1701<br />
newyork<br />
nicholas<br />
nicole<br />
nipple<br />
nipples<br />
oliver<br />
orange<br />
packers<br />
panther<br />
panties<br />
parker<br />
password<br />
password<br />
password1<br />
password12<br />
password123<br />
patrick<br />
peaches<br />
peanut<br />
pepper<br />
phantom<br />
phoenix<br />
player<br />
please<br />
pookie<br />
porsche<br />
prince<br />
princess<br />
private<br />
purple<br />
pussies<br />
qazwsx<br />
qwerty<br />
qwertyui<br />
rabbit<br />
rachel<br />
racing<br />
raiders<br />
rainbow<br />
ranger<br />
rangers<br />
rebecca<br />
redskins<br />
redsox<br />
redwings<br />
richard<br />
robert<br />
rocket<br />
rosebud<br />
runner<br />
rush2112<br />
russia<br />
samantha<br />
sammy<br />
samson<br />
sandra<br />
saturn<br />
scooby<br />
scooter<br />
scorpio</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">scorpion<br />
secret<br />
sexsex<br />
shadow<br />
shannon<br />
shaved<br />
sierra<br />
silver<br />
skippy<br />
slayer<br />
smokey<br />
snoopy<br />
soccer<br />
sophie<br />
spanky<br />
sparky<br />
spider<br />
squirt<br />
srinivas<br />
startrek<br />
starwars<br />
steelers<br />
steven<br />
sticky<br />
stupid<br />
success<br />
summer<br />
sunshine<br />
superman<br />
surfer<br />
swimming<br />
sydney<br />
taylor<br />
tennis<br />
teresa<br />
tester<br />
testing<br />
theman<br />
thomas<br />
thunder<br />
thx1138<br />
tiffany<br />
tigers<br />
tigger<br />
tomcat<br />
topgun<br />
toyota<br />
travis<br />
trouble<br />
trustno1<br />
tucker<br />
turtle<br />
twitter<br />
united<br />
vagina<br />
victor<br />
victoria<br />
viking<br />
voodoo<br />
voyager<br />
walter<br />
warrior<br />
welcome<br />
whatever<br />
william<br />
willie<br />
wilson<br />
winner<br />
winston<br />
winter<br />
wizard<br />
xavier<br />
xxxxxx<br />
xxxxxxxx<br />
yamaha</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">yankee<br />
yankees<br />
yellow<br />
zxcvbn<br />
zxcvbnm<br />
zzzzzz</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/12/twitter-bans-common-passwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: I&#8217;m on Facebook &#8211; Now What???</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/12/25/book-review-im-on-facebook-now-what/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/12/25/book-review-im-on-facebook-now-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1600050956?ie=UTF8&#38;tag=nikolaidiscom-20&#38;linkCode=as2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=390957&#38;creativeASIN=1600050956">I'm on Facebook--Now What???: How to Get Personal, Business, and Professional Value from Facebook</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=nikolaidiscom-20&#38;l=as2&#38;o=1&#38;a=1600050956" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />. While the majority of this 100 page book was review for me, I would recommend it to anyone who is brand new to Facebook or social networking in general.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1600050956?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=nikolaidiscom-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=1600050956">I&#8217;m on Facebook&#8211;Now What???: How to Get Personal, Business, and Professional Value from Facebook</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=nikolaidiscom-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1600050956" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />. While the majority of this 100 page book was review for me, I would recommend it to anyone who is brand new to Facebook or social networking in general.</p>
<p><span id="more-297"></span>While the content is good, it is rather elementary, so if you are already familiar with Facebook, you&#8217;ll probably be better served by something else. I bought the book to see what sort of insight it would give for business applications, but I found the chapter on this topic to be short and not very enlightening. Also, I found the topics of privacy and security to be a bit lacking. The best advice they have is to not post anything that you wouldn&#8217;t want your grandma to see, because it may come back to haunt you. However, they also recommend you install lots of applications, without stressing that installing Facebook apps (of dubious nature) is a quick and easy way to get your account hacked.</p>
<p>While it was published nearly two years ago, the majority of the book is still up to date and current. However, some things have changed recently, especially with respect to default privacy settings, covered in the privacy chapter.</p>
<p>Also, the book is a little expensive, given its size. However, if you are just getting into social networking and Facebook, it does provide a good overall view of the service to newcomers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/12/25/book-review-im-on-facebook-now-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft: &#8220;Please Upgrade from Internet Explorer 6.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/12/21/microsoft-please-upgrade-from-internet-explorer-6/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/12/21/microsoft-please-upgrade-from-internet-explorer-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP will be supported until July 2010, the writing on the wall is fairly clear, and Microsoft is encouraging users to upgrade to IE 7 or IE 8.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP will be supported until July 2010, the writing on the wall is fairly clear, and Microsoft is encouraging users to upgrade to IE 7 or IE 8. Additionally, we have been recommending alternative browsers for years.<span id="more-295"></span> Like in the mid-90&#8242;s the browser wars are heating up, and you have several options to choose from when considering a browser for general web surfing. My personal favorite is <a title="Mozilla" href="http://www.mozilla.org" target="_blank">Mozilla</a> <a title="Firefox" href="http://getfirefox.com" target="_blank">Firefox</a>, which I use on Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux, but I regularly use <a title="Google Chrome" href="http://google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome</a> (mostly for accessing Google&#8217;s services) and <a title="Apple Inc." href="http://www.apple.com" target="_blank">Apple&#8217;s</a> <a title="Apple Safari" href="http://www.apple.com/safari" target="_blank">Safari</a> when on my Macintosh. I also use <a title="Opera browser" href="http://www.opera.com" target="_blank">Opera</a> from time to time, but it is different enough from most of the other mainstream browsers</p>
<p>If you have not yet looked at one of these other browsers, I strongly recommend you do. If you are wedded to Internet Explorer, then you should at least be on version 7, if not 8. Also, several of our clients have been told that they must use Internet Explorer for an application that they use which requires it. What&#8217;s shocking is that several of my clients have vendors who insist that they continue to use IE 6! This, despite the fact that it&#8217;s easily the least secure mainstream browser still available today. If you are unlucky enough to be in this group, I strongly recommend you put pressure on your vendors who are requiring IE 6, and tell them to  support current versions, or better yet, make their application less browser-specific so that it works with other platforms like Firefox, Chrome, Opera, and Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/12/21/microsoft-please-upgrade-from-internet-explorer-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
