<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paradigm Consulting Co. &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/category/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com</link>
	<description>Information technology and security advice for small businesses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:36:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 2000 End of Life</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/07/13/windows-2000-end-of-life/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/07/13/windows-2000-end-of-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today marks the end of life (all forms of support) for Windows 2000 and Windows XP Service Pack 2.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today marks the end of life (all forms of support) for Windows 2000 and Windows XP Service Pack 2. This means that, while new threats and bugs will continue to be found in these operating systems for some time, they will receive no further updates from Microsoft.</p>
<p>If you are still running these at your business or at home, an upgrade is called for as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/07/13/windows-2000-end-of-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Dumps Windows (At Least, Unofficially)</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/06/04/google-dumps-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/06/04/google-dumps-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has decided to ditch Windows and move employees to Macintosh and Linux PCs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a title="Financial Times" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d2f3f04e-6ccf-11df-91c8-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">Financial Times article</a> reports that <a title="Google" href="http://google.com" target="_blank">Google</a>, without question one of the Internet&#8217;s strongest influences today, has decided to ditch Windows and move employees to Macintosh and Linux PCs. This move is reportedly largely due to the January hacks on Google and many other corporations, allegedly originating from China. Windows has a long-standing perceived history of having a worse security track record than its competition, and a large part of this comes because it&#8217;s simply the largest attack surface. Not surprisingly, the same thing that makes it the most widely developed-for platform for applications keeps it the highest profile target for malware and security exploits as well.</p>
<p>I applaud this move toward security and productivity. I don&#8217;t think it will be a easy task for Google, but I believe it will be worth the effort in the long run.</p>
<p>Does <strong>your</strong> company need to consider switching away from Windows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/06/04/google-dumps-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safe Browsing Tip: Mozilla Plugin Check</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/24/safe-browsing-tip-mozilla-plugin-check/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/24/safe-browsing-tip-mozilla-plugin-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mozilla project recently expanded their popular and successful (and free) Plugin Check  service to support non-Mozilla browsers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mozilla project recently expanded their popular and successful (and free) <a title="Mozilla Plugin Check" href="http://mozilla.com/plugincheck" target="_blank">Plugin Check</a> service to support non-Mozilla browsers. So now, not only does this service, which scans your browser&#8217;s settings for outdated plugins, e.g., Adobe Flash Player, work with Firefox, but also with <a title="Opera" href="http://opera.com" target="_blank">Opera</a>, <a title="Google Chrome" href="http://google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome</a>, <a title="Apple Safari" href="http://apple.com/safari" target="_blank">Apple Safari</a>, and even, to a limited extent, <a href="http://microsoft.com/ie" target="_blank">Microsoft Internet Explorer</a>. Given that <a href="http://www.sans.org/top-cyber-security-risks/summary.php" target="_blank">unpatched client software, especially operating systems, browsers, and browser plugins, remain the top cyber-security concern</a> today, everyone should stop what they&#8217;re doing and go to <a href="http://mozilla.com/plugincheck" target="_blank">Mozilla Plugin Check</a> right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/24/safe-browsing-tip-mozilla-plugin-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still Think You Want Those Admin Rights Over Your PC? Think Again.</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/10/still-think-you-want-those-admin-rights-over-your-pc-think-again/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/10/still-think-you-want-those-admin-rights-over-your-pc-think-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you missed a previous post or two on the topic of why end users should not have administrative rights over their PCs, BeyondTrust has released a very compelling report on this issue. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed a previous post or two on the topic of <a href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/14/why-you-do-not-want-administrative-rights-on-your-computer/">why end users should not have administrative rights over their PCs</a>, BeyondTrust has released a very compelling report on this issue. But first, let me ask the reader a few questions. <span id="more-367"></span></p>
<p>First off, what if I had a very simple security fix, requiring no new software to be purchased or installed, and with minimal configuration changes, that could block 64% of all Microsoft vulnerabilities reported  									in 2009? Would you be interested? What if I told you we had a fix that could also prevent 94% of Internet Explorer and 100% of Internet  									Explorer 8 vulnerabilities reported in 2009? How about blocking 100% of Microsoft Office vulnerabilities reported  									in 2009? Still not enough? How about blocking 90% of critical Windows 7 vulnerabilities reported  									to date?</p>
<p>As you should have guessed by now, <em>the fix for all of these </em>is the same: removing administrative rights from end users over their PCs.</p>
<p>While there are still some (poorly written) desktop applications which require administrative rights to run, I have found these to be relatively few in number these days, and once the initial configuration has been done, most programs run just fine as an ordinary user. Despite the additional configuration required by some programs, including hardware drivers, that needs to be done by an admin, the cost of setting these up the right way is generally far less than recovering from the damage caused by a serious malware outbreak.</p>
<p>The <a title="BeyondTrust report on Windows administrative rights" href="http://www.beyondtrust.com/PressReleases/2010_03_29_Windows_7.aspx?section=Press-Releases" target="_blank">press release</a> and the <a title="BeyondTrust report on Windows administrative rights" href="http://www.beyondtrust.com/downloads/whitepapers/documents/wp039_BeyondTrust_2009_Microsoft_Vulnerability_Analysis.pdf" target="_blank">complete report</a> are available from <a href="http://www.beyondtrust.com" target="_blank">BeyondTrust&#8217;s website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/10/still-think-you-want-those-admin-rights-over-your-pc-think-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malware Being Distributed by Mainstream Websites</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/29/malware-being-distributed-by-mainstream-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/29/malware-being-distributed-by-mainstream-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Half of the web is offering you malware. What can you do to keep yourself safe?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <a title="Yahoo, Google, Fox serve up malware in ads" href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/yahoo-fox-and-google-inadvertently-spread-malware-through-ads/" target="_blank">this article from Digital Trends</a>, some of the most popular websites on the Internet have been (unintentionally) serving up malware ia the ad networks that they subscribe to. <span id="more-351"></span></p>
<p>While these sites had no intention (or maybe even knowledge) of this, it goes to underscore a point that, while you may trust Google, Yahoo!, Fox, Facebook, eBay, etc., as trustworthy sites, the bulk of the content that these sites serve up is not coming from them &#8211; it&#8217;s coming from third parties, such as ad networks, which you don&#8217;t necessarily trust, or even know.</p>
<p>To protect yourself from this sort of attack, I recommend the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Limit unnecessary web surfing, especially at work and doubly so for machines and networks which handle sensitive information. If you don&#8217;t go to the site in the first place, you can&#8217;t get infected.</li>
<li>Make sure you are using a recent &#8220;alternative&#8221; browser, such as Firefox or Chrome. While this is no guarantee of safety, Internet Explorer is still the main target for browser-based attacks. Using an alternative platform may lower this risk by lowering your profile.</li>
<li>Run extensions such as Adblock Plus and NoScript. These disable active programming on websites by default. Note: This does mean more work for you, as the bulk of websites you hit will not work until you enable the scripting components on the pages. However, you are much, much safer from this type of attack.</li>
<li>Keep your operating system and all other software on your computer patched and up to date. Many of these sorts of attacks rely on flaws in software installed on your computer. If the flaws are patched, then you are less vulnerable to the attack.</li>
<li>Know what your anti-malware program and operating system alerts look like. Many of these &#8220;drive by downloads&#8221; rely on tricking the user into installing malware by popping up fake notices telling them that their system is infected, and needs to be scanned. What they are really doing is tricking the user into running the malware in the first place! Don&#8217;t be fooled! Learn what your software really is likely to say in the event of malware detection, and how to respond appropriately. If you have any questions, contact your IT staff before taking any action, including clicking on links or closing windows.</li>
<li>As always, <a title="Why you do NOT want admin rights on your PC." href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/14/why-you-do-not-want-administrative-rights-on-your-computer/" target="_blank">drop those admin rights</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/29/malware-being-distributed-by-mainstream-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Answers to Yesterday&#8217;s Password Quiz</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/23/answers-to-yesterdays-password-quiz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/23/answers-to-yesterdays-password-quiz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In yesterdays&#8217; post, we offered a quiz to rate your password IQ. Here are the answers.1. How often should you change your password? a) Every 30 days b) Every 60 days c) Every 90 days d) When IT tells you to Answer: (a) &#8211; And the more often you replace your strong password with another [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a title="Password Quiz" href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/22/password-quiz/">yesterdays&#8217; post</a>, we offered a quiz to rate your password IQ. Here are the answers.<span id="more-337"></span><strong>1. How often should you change your password?<br />
</strong>a) Every 30 days<br />
b) Every 60 days<br />
c) Every 90 days<br />
d) When IT tells you to<br />
<strong>Answer: (a) &#8211; And the more often you replace your strong password with<br />
another strong password, the better. What&#8217;s a &#8220;strong&#8221; password? Read<br />
on.<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>2.  One of your co-workers is working on a critical report this weekend<br />
and needs access to some of your files.  How should you give her your<br />
password?<br />
</strong>a) Send it in an email message<br />
b) Call her on the phone and tell her the password<br />
c) Don&#8217;t give it to her or anybody else<br />
d) Write it on a piece of paper, seal it in an envelope, and mail it to<br />
her<br />
<strong>Answer: (c) &#8211; If she needs access to your files, call your IT department<br />
and ask them to give her access without the use of your password.<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>3.  What is the most common (and so the weakest) password used in 2009?<br />
</strong>a) password<br />
b) 123456<br />
c) qwerty<br />
d) abc123<br />
<strong>Answer:  (a) &#8211; Actually, the list is in order, according to PC<br />
Magazine.*  If you are using these passwords or anything like them, you<br />
might as well just give people access to your computer or your bank<br />
account.</strong></p>
<p><strong> 4. What characters should you use in a password to make it strong?<br />
</strong>a) Letters only<br />
b) Numbers only<br />
c) Letters and punctuation<br />
d) All of the above<br />
<strong>Answer:  (d) &#8211; The more complex a password is, the harder it is for a<br />
person to guess it.  Some systems and websites may not allow you to use<br />
all of the punctuation symbols, but most allow some of them.<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>5. How long should a strong password be?<br />
</strong>a) Five characters<br />
b) Eight characters<br />
c) As long as possible<br />
d) Size doesn&#8217;t matter<br />
<strong>Answer: It depends! For technical reasons, a minimum length of 8<br />
characters is recommended. But not all eight-character passwords are<br />
equally strong. For example, &#8220;football&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t be hard to guess, but<br />
guessing the 8 characters of 7xkM*vh$ presents a real challenge.<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>6.  Now that you are an expert, choose the strongest password from this  list:<br />
</strong>a) Mickey.Mouse<br />
b) M1ck3y.m0u53<br />
c) 3.1416**<br />
d) Ad@46-Hiz<br />
e) Aristotle<br />
<strong>Answer: (d) &#8211; (a) is obviously easy to guess, even though it&#8217;s long<br />
enough; (b) is &#8220;hacker-speak&#8221; for Mickey Mouse &#8211; a bad idea; (c)<br />
contains no letters &#8211; and it&#8217;s the approximate value of Pi; and (e) is<br />
a proper name.<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>Strong password checklist<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>at least 8 characters</li>
<li>at least one number</li>
<li> at least one uppercase and one lowercase letter</li>
<li>at least one symbol (examples: &amp;, !, @, #, $, ^, *)</li>
<li>no proper names or words (English or otherwise)</li>
<li>no personal information, like your SSN, phone number, or date of birth</li>
<li>no repeating characters</li>
<li>no easy-to-guess patterns like 123qwerty</li>
<li>no well-known mathematical values (like Pi) or equations (E=mc2)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Tips<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Treat passwords like your toothbrush: Choose a good one and replace it regularly.</li>
<li> Change your passwords at least every 30 days.</li>
<li> Use a passphrase. Choose an easily remembered phrase like &#8220;Liberty and Justice Forever&#8221; and use the first one or two letters of each word with some punctuation and numbers in between. Example: Li.an1Ju*Fo.</li>
<li> Use a password pattern. Pick a starting point on the keyboard, trace out an easily remembered pattern, and add some twists. Example: The eight-character pattern 1qscvhU* describes a &#8220;V&#8221; on your keyboard starting with the number 1 key, with the added twists of an uppercase U and an asterisk.</li>
<li> Use a password manager.  If you use Firefox, for example, you can have your browser remember your passwords. Then be sure to <a title="Master password in Firefox" href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/05/08/how-to-use-a-master-password/" target="_blank">set a strong master password in Firefox</a> to protect your &#8220;remembered&#8221; passwords.</li>
<li> Other versatile, no-cost or low-cost password managers include<a title="Roboform" href="http://www.roboform.com/" target="_blank"> Roboform</a> and <a title="KeePass" href="http://keepass.info/">KeePass</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>This material is reprinted, with permission, from the February edition of the SANS Ouch!  newsletter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/23/answers-to-yesterdays-password-quiz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Password Quiz</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/22/password-quiz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/22/password-quiz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This month&#8217;s SANS Ouch! (Vol.7 No. 2) newsletter asks the question &#8220;What is your Password IQ?&#8221; I&#8217;m reprinting the questions (with permission) in this post, and will post the answers in a subsequent post to let you rate your own password knowledge. What&#8217;s your Password IQ? 1. How often should you change your password? a) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This month&#8217;s SANS Ouch! (Vol.7 No. 2) newsletter asks the question &#8220;What is your Password IQ?&#8221; <span id="more-335"></span></p>
<p>I&#8217;m reprinting the questions (with permission) in this post, and will post the answers in a subsequent post to let you rate your own password knowledge.</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s your Password IQ?</strong></p>
<p><strong> 1. How often should you change your password?</strong><br />
a) Every 30 days<br />
b) Every 60 days<br />
c) Every 90 days<br />
d) When IT tells you to</p>
<p><strong> 2.  One of your co-workers is working on a critical report this weekend<br />
and needs access to some of your files.  How should you give her your<br />
password?</strong><br />
a) Send it in an email message<br />
b) Call her on the phone and tell her the password<br />
c) Don&#8217;t give it to her or anybody else<br />
d) Write it on a piece of paper, seal it in an envelope, and mail it to<br />
her<br />
<strong><br />
3.  What is the most common (and so the weakest) password used in 2009?</strong><br />
a) password<br />
b) 123456<br />
c) qwerty<br />
d) abc123</p>
<p><strong> 4. What characters should you use in a password to make it strong?</strong><br />
a) Letters only<br />
b) Numbers only<br />
c) Letters and punctuation<br />
d) All of the above</p>
<p><strong> 5. How long should a strong password be?</strong><br />
a) Five characters<br />
b) Eight characters<br />
c) As long as possible<br />
d) Size doesn&#8217;t matter</p>
<p><strong> 6.  Now that you are an expert, choose the strongest password from this  list:</strong><br />
a) Mickey.Mouse<br />
b) M1ck3y.m0u53<br />
c) 3.1416**<br />
d) Ad@46-Hiz<br />
e) Aristotle</p>
<p>The full SANS Ouch! newsletter, and others, are available at the <a title="SANS Ouch!" href="https://www.sans.org/newsletters/ouch/">SANS website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/22/password-quiz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Drops Internet Explorer (IE) 6. So Should You.</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/11/google-drops-internet-explorer-ie-6-so-should-you/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/11/google-drops-internet-explorer-ie-6-so-should-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, I received this in an email from Google: In order to continue to improve our products and deliver more sophisticated features and performance&#8230; we will be phasing out support for Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 as well as other older browsers that are not supported by their own manufacturers. It&#8217;s about time, and not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I received this in an email from Google:</p>
<blockquote><p>In order to continue to improve our products and deliver more sophisticated features and performance&#8230; we will be phasing out support for Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 as well as other older browsers that are not supported by their own manufacturers.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s about time, and not just for those reasons.<span id="more-332"></span></p>
<p>Internet Explorer is arguably the most insecure web browser in current use today. It&#8217;s very old, in Internet terms, and really needs to be replaced. If you are still using Internet Explorer, you need to upgrade to <a title="Internet Explorer" href="http://www.microsoft.com/ie" target="_blank">IE 7 or IE 8</a>, or switch to another browser like <a title="Mozilla Firefox" href="http://getfirefox.com" target="_blank">Mozilla Firefox</a> (currently at version 3.6), <a title="Google Chrome" href="http://google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome</a>, <a href="http://opera.com" target="_blank">Opera</a>, or <a title="Safari" href="http://apple.com/safari" target="_blank">Safari</a>.</p>
<p>If you are one of those unfortunate folks who are required to use Internet Explorer 6 for a legacy web application, contact your vendor immediately and tell them that they need to change their application to support newer browsers. There is no excuse for continuing to use Internet Explorer when<a title="Microsoft recommends upgrading from IE6" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=&quot;To+help+protect+our+customers%2C+we+recommend+that+all+customers+immediately+upgrade+to+Internet+Explorer+8.&quot;" target="_blank"> Microsoft itself has recommended that people discontinue its use</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/11/google-drops-internet-explorer-ie-6-so-should-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA Recommends Dedicated PC for Online Banking</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/22/aba-recommends-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/22/aba-recommends-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting & Bookkeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this month the American Bankers Association (ABA) has issued practical, simple advice which could dramatically enhance everyone's online banking security. And, I predict, it won't make any difference because people are unlikely to do it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month the <a title="American Bankers Association" href="http://www.aba.com/" target="_blank">American Bankers Association</a> (ABA) has issued practical, simple advice which could dramatically enhance everyone&#8217;s online banking security. And, I predict, it won&#8217;t make any difference because people are unlikely to do it.<span id="more-313"></span></p>
<p>The advice is to have a PC dedicated to online banking. If you weigh the convenience and cost savings of having access to online banking, versus time spent on the phone or traveling to and from a bank to conduct your business, the expense of a PC dedicated to this task, to continue to enable online banking, will likely be recouped within a matter of weeks, if not days.</p>
<p>The three arguments I&#8217;ve heard against this are:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>We don&#8217;t have enough money in the bank for anyone to want to hack it. </em>(Or, &#8220;<em>no one is interested in us because we&#8217;re too small.</em>&#8220;)<br />
Then it sounds like you have everything to lose! Isn&#8217;t it more important to protect what assets you have, regardless of size?</li>
<li><em>We&#8217;re protected by our bank&#8217;s security.</em><br />
No, you&#8217;re not. Bank websites get hacked frequently. Don&#8217;t believe me? Just do a <a title="Google search for &quot;bank website hacked&quot;" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=bank+website+hacked" target="_blank">Google search on the subject</a>. Furthermore, the banks are not required to refund your money! You do not have the same protections as you do with credit cards on bank accounts. Finally, it&#8217;s not usually the <em>bank</em> that gets hacked &#8211; it&#8217;s <em>your computer</em>.</li>
<li><em>We can&#8217;t afford the expense.</em><br />
The cost of a lightweight PC dedicated to this task is most likely lower than most of my clients&#8217; electric bill, heating bill, or liability insurance for one month. You <em>can</em> afford the cost. But can you afford getting hacked and having your assets drained?</li>
</ul>
<p>This is the <a href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/11/10/small-businesses-continue-to-lose-big/">same advice we gave on this blog</a> last year. It&#8217;s sound. It&#8217;s simple. It&#8217;s cheap. Get a new <a title="Netbook" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netbook" target="_blank">netbook</a> for a couple hundred dollars and use that for online banking. Is this not worth the risk of your business losing tens of thousands of dollars from its bank account? Please, if you do online banking at home or at work, at the very least, practice it from a non-Windows computer not running Internet Explorer. Better yet, prove me wrong and get a cheap PC and dedicate it to your online banking needs. Never go to any website other than your bank&#8217;s with it. Another alternative would be to boot from a live CD of your favorite Linux distribution, such as my favorite, <a title="Ubuntu" href="http://www.ubuntu.com" target="_blank">Ubuntu</a>.</p>
<p><strong>References</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lastwatchdog.com/american-bankers-associations-small-business-warning/" target="_blank">http://lastwatchdog.com/american-bankers-associations-small-business-warning/</a></li>
<li><a href="# http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/aba-recommends-using-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/" target="_blank">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/aba-recommends-using-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/</a></li>
<li><a href="    *  http://news.softpedia.com/news/Small-Businesses-Should-Conduct-Online-Banking-from-Dedicated-Computers-131086.shtml" target="_blank">http://news.softpedia.com/news/Small-Businesses-Should-Conduct-Online-Banking-from-Dedicated-Computers-131086.shtml</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sans.org/newsletters/newsbites/newsbites.php?vol=12&amp;issue=1#sID200" target="_blank">http://www.sans.org/newsletters/newsbites/newsbites.php?vol=12&amp;issue=1#sID200</a></li>
<li><a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2010/01/online-banking-precaution-for-small-and-mid-sized-businesses-draws-attention-/1?loc=interstitialskip" target="_blank">http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2010/01/online-banki<br />
ng-precaution-for-small-and-mid-sized-businesses-draws-attention-/1</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/01/01/Businesses-warned-about-online-banking/UPI-81761262329630/" target="_blank">http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/01/01/Businesses-warned-about-online-banking<br />
/UPI-81761262329630/</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/22/aba-recommends-dedicated-pc-for-online-banking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the Google/China Hack Means to You</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/17/what-the-googlechina-hack-means-to-you/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/17/what-the-googlechina-hack-means-to-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trusting Google does not just mean "trusting that Google won't do anything evil with my data." It also means "trusting Google will never make a mistake which accidentally opens my data up to anyone else."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friends and listeners to the <a title="Fresh Ubuntu Podcast" href="http://freshubuntu.org" target="_blank">Fresh Ubuntu Podcast</a> will know that I frequently raise concerns about <a title="Google" href="http://google.com" target="_blank">Google</a> and the information that it acquires about all of us. My concerns normally are along the lines of &#8220;just imagine what Google can do with all of that information.&#8221; However, I&#8217;ve never brought up what could be an even bigger concern: &#8220;What if <em>someone else</em> were to get a hold of all of that information?&#8221;<span id="more-306"></span></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume, for argument&#8217;s sake, that Google does abide by its own <a title="Google Code of Conduct: Don't be evil." href="http://investor.google.com/conduct.html" target="_blank">code of conduct</a> and isn&#8217;t evil. They&#8217;re still amassing a staggering amount of data about nearly every Internet user. Now, with more and more companies &#8220;<a title="Go Google campaign" href="http://www.Google.com/Apps-at-Work" target="_blank">Going Google</a>,&#8221; Google has access to data that it wouldn&#8217;t in the past. Now, they aren&#8217;t just indexing your website, blogs, or even chats and emails. Now they&#8217;re indexing your corporate <a title="Google Docs" href="http://docs.google.com" target="_blank">documents</a> &#8211; you know, the sensitive things you&#8217;re &#8220;not supposed to send via email?&#8221;</p>
<p>While I am quite confident in <a title="Google security" href="http://www.google.com/corporate/security.html" target="_blank">Google&#8217;s security capabilities</a>, no one is perfect. And like my aikido instructor used to say, there&#8217;s always someone stronger, or quicker than you. Last week, Google met its security match when their servers were hacked.</p>
<p>While I won&#8217;t delve into the economic and political issues which revolve around this hack (see footnotes for plenty of reference links), there are plenty of lessons we can take away from this:</p>
<ul>
<li>By most accounts, Google&#8217;s servers were hacked by good, old-fashioned social engineering:<br />
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Using a sophisticated spear-phishing campaign, the perpetrators included malicious links exploiting the bug in emails and instant messages sent to employees&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This means that the attackers were not hammering through firewalls or reprogramming routers &#8211; they had people <a title="Don't click on links in email" href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/04/10/security-tip-dont-click-on-links-and-dont-send-them-either/" target="_blank">click links</a> on what they thought were legitimate emails and exploited security flaws in common desktop software to gain access.</li>
<li>Users accounts which were hacked were most likely running with <a title="Why you do NOT want Administrative Rights over your PC" href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/14/why-you-do-not-want-administrative-rights-on-your-computer/">administrative privileges</a> over their desktop systems.</li>
<li>If Google can be hacked, anyone can. By extension, if your data is with Google, you can be hacked as well.</li>
<li>Trusting Google does not just mean &#8220;trusting that Google won&#8217;t do anything evil with my data.&#8221; It also means &#8220;trusting Google will never make a mistake which accidentally opens my data up to anyone else.&#8221;</li>
<li>Substitute the word &#8220;Google&#8221; with any popular online service or enterprise firm that has a lot of (your) data (e.g. <a title="Facebook" href="http://facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a>, <a title="Salesforce" href="http://salesforce.com" target="_blank">Salesforce</a>, <a title="Amazon" href="http://amazon.com" target="_blank">Amazon</a>). This is not a problem just with Google.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/">Researchers identify command servers behind Google attack</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/">Adobe Reader vuln hit with unusually advanced attack • The Register</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> IE zero-day used in Chinese cyber assault on 34 firms • The Register</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> Google may exit China after &#8216;highly targeted&#8217; attack • The Register</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9144138/Update_Google_may_pull_out_of_China_because_of_cyberattacks?taxonomyId=17" target="_blank">Google May Pull Out of China After Cyber Attack</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/13/world/asia/13beijing.html" target="_blank">NY Times Article on Google/China Hack</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> Official Google Blog: A new approach to China</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> China Defends Internet Censorship</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> Ballmer doesn&#8217;t get why Google is upset about attacks | Googling Google | ZDNet.com</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/04/adobe_reader_attack/"> US will complain to China about Google hacking • The Register</a></li>
<li><a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=7969" target="_blank">SANS Internet Storm Center Diary</a></li>
</ul>
<p>﻿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/01/17/what-the-googlechina-hack-means-to-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
