<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paradigm Consulting Co.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com</link>
	<description>Information technology and security advice for small businesses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:36:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 2000 End of Life</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/07/13/windows-2000-end-of-life/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/07/13/windows-2000-end-of-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today marks the end of life (all forms of support) for Windows 2000 and Windows XP Service Pack 2.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today marks the end of life (all forms of support) for Windows 2000 and Windows XP Service Pack 2. This means that, while new threats and bugs will continue to be found in these operating systems for some time, they will receive no further updates from Microsoft.</p>
<p>If you are still running these at your business or at home, an upgrade is called for as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/07/13/windows-2000-end-of-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Dumps Windows (At Least, Unofficially)</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/06/04/google-dumps-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/06/04/google-dumps-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has decided to ditch Windows and move employees to Macintosh and Linux PCs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a title="Financial Times" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d2f3f04e-6ccf-11df-91c8-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">Financial Times article</a> reports that <a title="Google" href="http://google.com" target="_blank">Google</a>, without question one of the Internet&#8217;s strongest influences today, has decided to ditch Windows and move employees to Macintosh and Linux PCs. This move is reportedly largely due to the January hacks on Google and many other corporations, allegedly originating from China. Windows has a long-standing perceived history of having a worse security track record than its competition, and a large part of this comes because it&#8217;s simply the largest attack surface. Not surprisingly, the same thing that makes it the most widely developed-for platform for applications keeps it the highest profile target for malware and security exploits as well.</p>
<p>I applaud this move toward security and productivity. I don&#8217;t think it will be a easy task for Google, but I believe it will be worth the effort in the long run.</p>
<p>Does <strong>your</strong> company need to consider switching away from Windows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/06/04/google-dumps-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Promises Better Privacy Controls &#8211; Again</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/25/facebook-promises-better-privacy-controls-again/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/25/facebook-promises-better-privacy-controls-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, Mark Zuckerberg wrote an article in the Washington Post addressing recent privacy concerns and promising better control over your privacy settings. I don't buy it. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/markzuckerberg">Mark Zuckerberg</a> wrote <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/23/AR2010052303828.html">an article in the Washington Post</a> addressing recent privacy concerns and promising better control over your privacy settings. I don&#8217;t buy it.</p>
<p><span id="more-378"></span>We&#8217;ve heard the same thing before. In 2007, when Facebook introduced <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_Beacon">Beacon</a>, there was a an outcry from the Facebook community. Facebook responded with the governance council, then, a couple of years later, introduced new and better privacy controls. The default setting for these? Everything was open to everyone. Who do they think they are fooling? Apparently about 400,000,000 of us Facebook users, that&#8217;s who.</p>
<p>Once again, due to a large public outcry, this time by a number of web-celebs who threatened to, or actually did, deactivate their Facebook accounts, Zuckerberg and company again responded, and promised to fix the issue. I can&#8217;t help but think this is like a bad relationship with a partner (Facebook) who, despite repeated promises, just can&#8217;t seem to keep promises or stop taking advantage of the other (you).</p>
<p>As always, assume that anything and everything you post to Facebook is public. Period. Forget &#8220;privacy settings&#8221; which give you a false sense of security. They can be changed at any time. Your personal information can be shared by Facebook (and other online services) any time they feel like it. They&#8217;ve done it before, and I&#8217;m convinced they&#8217;ll do it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/25/facebook-promises-better-privacy-controls-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safe Browsing Tip: Mozilla Plugin Check</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/24/safe-browsing-tip-mozilla-plugin-check/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/24/safe-browsing-tip-mozilla-plugin-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mozilla project recently expanded their popular and successful (and free) Plugin Check  service to support non-Mozilla browsers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mozilla project recently expanded their popular and successful (and free) <a title="Mozilla Plugin Check" href="http://mozilla.com/plugincheck" target="_blank">Plugin Check</a> service to support non-Mozilla browsers. So now, not only does this service, which scans your browser&#8217;s settings for outdated plugins, e.g., Adobe Flash Player, work with Firefox, but also with <a title="Opera" href="http://opera.com" target="_blank">Opera</a>, <a title="Google Chrome" href="http://google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome</a>, <a title="Apple Safari" href="http://apple.com/safari" target="_blank">Apple Safari</a>, and even, to a limited extent, <a href="http://microsoft.com/ie" target="_blank">Microsoft Internet Explorer</a>. Given that <a href="http://www.sans.org/top-cyber-security-risks/summary.php" target="_blank">unpatched client software, especially operating systems, browsers, and browser plugins, remain the top cyber-security concern</a> today, everyone should stop what they&#8217;re doing and go to <a href="http://mozilla.com/plugincheck" target="_blank">Mozilla Plugin Check</a> right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/24/safe-browsing-tip-mozilla-plugin-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still Think You Want Those Admin Rights Over Your PC? Think Again.</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/10/still-think-you-want-those-admin-rights-over-your-pc-think-again/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/10/still-think-you-want-those-admin-rights-over-your-pc-think-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you missed a previous post or two on the topic of why end users should not have administrative rights over their PCs, BeyondTrust has released a very compelling report on this issue. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed a previous post or two on the topic of <a href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/14/why-you-do-not-want-administrative-rights-on-your-computer/">why end users should not have administrative rights over their PCs</a>, BeyondTrust has released a very compelling report on this issue. But first, let me ask the reader a few questions. <span id="more-367"></span></p>
<p>First off, what if I had a very simple security fix, requiring no new software to be purchased or installed, and with minimal configuration changes, that could block 64% of all Microsoft vulnerabilities reported  									in 2009? Would you be interested? What if I told you we had a fix that could also prevent 94% of Internet Explorer and 100% of Internet  									Explorer 8 vulnerabilities reported in 2009? How about blocking 100% of Microsoft Office vulnerabilities reported  									in 2009? Still not enough? How about blocking 90% of critical Windows 7 vulnerabilities reported  									to date?</p>
<p>As you should have guessed by now, <em>the fix for all of these </em>is the same: removing administrative rights from end users over their PCs.</p>
<p>While there are still some (poorly written) desktop applications which require administrative rights to run, I have found these to be relatively few in number these days, and once the initial configuration has been done, most programs run just fine as an ordinary user. Despite the additional configuration required by some programs, including hardware drivers, that needs to be done by an admin, the cost of setting these up the right way is generally far less than recovering from the damage caused by a serious malware outbreak.</p>
<p>The <a title="BeyondTrust report on Windows administrative rights" href="http://www.beyondtrust.com/PressReleases/2010_03_29_Windows_7.aspx?section=Press-Releases" target="_blank">press release</a> and the <a title="BeyondTrust report on Windows administrative rights" href="http://www.beyondtrust.com/downloads/whitepapers/documents/wp039_BeyondTrust_2009_Microsoft_Vulnerability_Analysis.pdf" target="_blank">complete report</a> are available from <a href="http://www.beyondtrust.com" target="_blank">BeyondTrust&#8217;s website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/05/10/still-think-you-want-those-admin-rights-over-your-pc-think-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Computers from Box Stores Don&#8217;t Save You Money</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/04/29/why-computers-from-box-stores-dont-save-you-money/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/04/29/why-computers-from-box-stores-dont-save-you-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott McGrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why should you pay $600-$1200 for a computer Paradigm quoted, when you can go into (BJ's/Walmart/Staples) and purchase a fully loaded computer for $350-$500?  A few reasons.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Why should you pay $600-$1200 for a computer we quoted, when you can go into (Best Buy/BJ&#8217;s/Walmart/Staples) and purchase a &#8220;fully loaded&#8221; computer for $350-$500?</div>
<div>Here are a few reasons:<span id="more-355"></span></div>
<ol>
<li>Warranty.  These computers generally come with a 1 year, limited manufacturer Warranty.  This means that if any part of the computer breaks after that, you can either &#8220;fix it yourself&#8221; (time and money) or replace the computer.  Unfortunately, the argument that &#8220;you can just go down and buy another computer&#8221; (money) is not really a good one, since you likely won&#8217;t be able to find an exact replacement, and will therefore have to set up the computer again from scratch (time).  When you spend a little money up front to purchase a computer we recommend, we make sure you get a 3 year business-class warranty, which includes free, on-site repair provided by the manufacturer (not Paradigm).</li>
<li>Compatibility.  These systems generally come with Windows XP Home, Vista Home Premium, or Windows 7 Home Ultimate.  These operating systems are not compatible with a Windows business network, not to mention other limitations that don&#8217;t belong in a business environment. An upgrade to XP Professional or Windows 7 Professional is an unaccounted for cost when you purchase one of these computers.</li>
<li>Standardization.  By purchasing a computer that we recommend, you will likely be able to take advantage of our familiarity with that particular product.  Often we will recommend a single line of computers to multiple customers, and in some cases it may even be one that we have deployed and tested in-house.  All computer models have &#8220;quirks&#8221; associated with them that make them unique, and knowing our way around them means more efficient deployment, maintenance, and troubleshooting- saving you money.</li>
<li>No Upsell. Most bog box store sales clerks are paid on commission. We&#8217;re not, and our margins are small. Paradigm has always been primarily a service entity, and the only things we sell to our clients are what they need.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/04/29/why-computers-from-box-stores-dont-save-you-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malware Being Distributed by Mainstream Websites</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/29/malware-being-distributed-by-mainstream-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/29/malware-being-distributed-by-mainstream-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Half of the web is offering you malware. What can you do to keep yourself safe?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <a title="Yahoo, Google, Fox serve up malware in ads" href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/yahoo-fox-and-google-inadvertently-spread-malware-through-ads/" target="_blank">this article from Digital Trends</a>, some of the most popular websites on the Internet have been (unintentionally) serving up malware ia the ad networks that they subscribe to. <span id="more-351"></span></p>
<p>While these sites had no intention (or maybe even knowledge) of this, it goes to underscore a point that, while you may trust Google, Yahoo!, Fox, Facebook, eBay, etc., as trustworthy sites, the bulk of the content that these sites serve up is not coming from them &#8211; it&#8217;s coming from third parties, such as ad networks, which you don&#8217;t necessarily trust, or even know.</p>
<p>To protect yourself from this sort of attack, I recommend the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Limit unnecessary web surfing, especially at work and doubly so for machines and networks which handle sensitive information. If you don&#8217;t go to the site in the first place, you can&#8217;t get infected.</li>
<li>Make sure you are using a recent &#8220;alternative&#8221; browser, such as Firefox or Chrome. While this is no guarantee of safety, Internet Explorer is still the main target for browser-based attacks. Using an alternative platform may lower this risk by lowering your profile.</li>
<li>Run extensions such as Adblock Plus and NoScript. These disable active programming on websites by default. Note: This does mean more work for you, as the bulk of websites you hit will not work until you enable the scripting components on the pages. However, you are much, much safer from this type of attack.</li>
<li>Keep your operating system and all other software on your computer patched and up to date. Many of these sorts of attacks rely on flaws in software installed on your computer. If the flaws are patched, then you are less vulnerable to the attack.</li>
<li>Know what your anti-malware program and operating system alerts look like. Many of these &#8220;drive by downloads&#8221; rely on tricking the user into installing malware by popping up fake notices telling them that their system is infected, and needs to be scanned. What they are really doing is tricking the user into running the malware in the first place! Don&#8217;t be fooled! Learn what your software really is likely to say in the event of malware detection, and how to respond appropriately. If you have any questions, contact your IT staff before taking any action, including clicking on links or closing windows.</li>
<li>As always, <a title="Why you do NOT want admin rights on your PC." href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2009/05/14/why-you-do-not-want-administrative-rights-on-your-computer/" target="_blank">drop those admin rights</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/29/malware-being-distributed-by-mainstream-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response to @Smallbizlady&#8217;s recent post &#8220;The Right Way To Make Sales Calls For Your Small Business&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/10/response-to-smallbizladys-recent-post-the-right-way-to-make-sales-calls-for-your-small-business/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/10/response-to-smallbizladys-recent-post-the-right-way-to-make-sales-calls-for-your-small-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read a post entitled ﻿&#8221;The Right Way To Make Sales Calls For Your Small Business.&#8221; This post outlines ten points which all make a lot of sense when making sales calls, except for number 7, where I disagree. ﻿﻿﻿&#8221;Do not leave a voicemail if you do not reach your sales target. Connections are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read a post entitled ﻿&#8221;<a title="The Right Way to Make Sales calls for Your Small Business" href="http://succeedasyourownboss.com/03/2010/the-right-way-to-make-sales-calls-for-your-small-business/" target="_blank">The Right Way To Make Sales Calls For Your Small Business</a>.&#8221; This post outlines ten points which all make a lot of sense when making sales calls, except for number 7, where I disagree.<span id="more-349"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>﻿﻿﻿&#8221;Do not leave a voicemail if you do not reach your sales target. Connections are only made with real people. Your message will be deleted anyway.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t follow. I leave voicemails. I don&#8217;t expect that my voicemail will close the sale, but <a href="http://blog.nikolaidis.com/2007/02/10/why-i-am-very-hard-to-reach-or-how-to-use-voicemail/" target="_self">to not leave a message when someone has put up a facility just for that seems silly to me</a>. I&#8217;d also supplement a call with an email, or vice versa, because some people are more responsive to some media than they are to others.</p>
<p>So, I agree on 9 out of 10 points. Keep up the good work, <a title="smallbizlady on twitter" href="http://twitter.com/smallbizlady" target="_blank">@smallbizlady</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/10/response-to-smallbizladys-recent-post-the-right-way-to-make-sales-calls-for-your-small-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hardware Review: Logitech diNovo Mini</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/01/hardware-review-logitech-dinovo-mini/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/01/hardware-review-logitech-dinovo-mini/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been using a Logitech diNovo Mini keyboard to control my home entertainment system, a Mac Mini, for the last few weeks, and I love it. The diNovo Mini is small, only about 6&#8243; wide by 3&#8243; high with the cover closed &#8211; about the size of a Hewlett Packard financial calculator, with keys sized [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using a Logitech diNovo Mini keyboard to control my home entertainment system, a Mac Mini, for the last few weeks, and I love it. <span id="more-339"></span></p>
<p>The diNovo Mini is small, only about 6&#8243; wide by 3&#8243; high with the cover closed &#8211; about the size of a Hewlett Packard financial calculator, with keys sized a bit larger than a Blackberry or a Sidekick. It has all of the standard keys of a QWERTY keyboard, plus Ctrl, Shift, Alt, and Super (Windows) keys. It also has standard media controls, including volume, pause/play, previous, next, and stop buttons for controlling apps like iTunes, Windows Media Player, or VLC. Although it lists Windows operating systems under system requirements, the unit works perfectly with Mac OS 10.6, and, while I haven&#8217;t tested it, I bet it would be fine with most Linux distros as well.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.logitech.com/repository/1732/png/14495.1.0.png" alt="" align="right" />What I found most useful about the unit was the combination trackpad/arrow keys in the upper left of the device. A toggle switch allows you to turn the circular trackpad (like the rectangular ones you find on notebook PCs) into a cursor pad not unlike what you find on video game controllers (instead of the traditional four directional arrow keys). It takes a little getting used to, but is fairly easy to grasp after a few minutes of playing with the device. While I certainly won&#8217;t be composing any long audit responses, doing graphics manipulation or programming with this for any significant length of time, it&#8217;s ideal for controlling a media center PC, light web surfing, or replying to a quick email &#8211; anything you might do on a smartphone or even a netbook.</p>
<p>The unit has excellent range, allowing me to control my PC via its Bluetooth connection from anywhere in the living room. It also has a built in rechargeable battery, and a 3 year hardware warranty, so no more wasting disposable batteries for the remote control.</p>
<p>The diNovo Mini<img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=nikolaidiscom-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B0011FOOI2" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> retails for $149, but can <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0011FOOI2?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=nikolaidiscom-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B0011FOOI2">can be found cheaper</a> at various online retailers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/03/01/hardware-review-logitech-dinovo-mini/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Answers to Yesterday&#8217;s Password Quiz</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/23/answers-to-yesterdays-password-quiz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/23/answers-to-yesterdays-password-quiz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nikolaidis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigmcc.com/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In yesterdays&#8217; post, we offered a quiz to rate your password IQ. Here are the answers.1. How often should you change your password? a) Every 30 days b) Every 60 days c) Every 90 days d) When IT tells you to Answer: (a) &#8211; And the more often you replace your strong password with another [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a title="Password Quiz" href="http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/22/password-quiz/">yesterdays&#8217; post</a>, we offered a quiz to rate your password IQ. Here are the answers.<span id="more-337"></span><strong>1. How often should you change your password?<br />
</strong>a) Every 30 days<br />
b) Every 60 days<br />
c) Every 90 days<br />
d) When IT tells you to<br />
<strong>Answer: (a) &#8211; And the more often you replace your strong password with<br />
another strong password, the better. What&#8217;s a &#8220;strong&#8221; password? Read<br />
on.<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>2.  One of your co-workers is working on a critical report this weekend<br />
and needs access to some of your files.  How should you give her your<br />
password?<br />
</strong>a) Send it in an email message<br />
b) Call her on the phone and tell her the password<br />
c) Don&#8217;t give it to her or anybody else<br />
d) Write it on a piece of paper, seal it in an envelope, and mail it to<br />
her<br />
<strong>Answer: (c) &#8211; If she needs access to your files, call your IT department<br />
and ask them to give her access without the use of your password.<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>3.  What is the most common (and so the weakest) password used in 2009?<br />
</strong>a) password<br />
b) 123456<br />
c) qwerty<br />
d) abc123<br />
<strong>Answer:  (a) &#8211; Actually, the list is in order, according to PC<br />
Magazine.*  If you are using these passwords or anything like them, you<br />
might as well just give people access to your computer or your bank<br />
account.</strong></p>
<p><strong> 4. What characters should you use in a password to make it strong?<br />
</strong>a) Letters only<br />
b) Numbers only<br />
c) Letters and punctuation<br />
d) All of the above<br />
<strong>Answer:  (d) &#8211; The more complex a password is, the harder it is for a<br />
person to guess it.  Some systems and websites may not allow you to use<br />
all of the punctuation symbols, but most allow some of them.<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>5. How long should a strong password be?<br />
</strong>a) Five characters<br />
b) Eight characters<br />
c) As long as possible<br />
d) Size doesn&#8217;t matter<br />
<strong>Answer: It depends! For technical reasons, a minimum length of 8<br />
characters is recommended. But not all eight-character passwords are<br />
equally strong. For example, &#8220;football&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t be hard to guess, but<br />
guessing the 8 characters of 7xkM*vh$ presents a real challenge.<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>6.  Now that you are an expert, choose the strongest password from this  list:<br />
</strong>a) Mickey.Mouse<br />
b) M1ck3y.m0u53<br />
c) 3.1416**<br />
d) Ad@46-Hiz<br />
e) Aristotle<br />
<strong>Answer: (d) &#8211; (a) is obviously easy to guess, even though it&#8217;s long<br />
enough; (b) is &#8220;hacker-speak&#8221; for Mickey Mouse &#8211; a bad idea; (c)<br />
contains no letters &#8211; and it&#8217;s the approximate value of Pi; and (e) is<br />
a proper name.<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>Strong password checklist<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>at least 8 characters</li>
<li>at least one number</li>
<li> at least one uppercase and one lowercase letter</li>
<li>at least one symbol (examples: &amp;, !, @, #, $, ^, *)</li>
<li>no proper names or words (English or otherwise)</li>
<li>no personal information, like your SSN, phone number, or date of birth</li>
<li>no repeating characters</li>
<li>no easy-to-guess patterns like 123qwerty</li>
<li>no well-known mathematical values (like Pi) or equations (E=mc2)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Tips<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Treat passwords like your toothbrush: Choose a good one and replace it regularly.</li>
<li> Change your passwords at least every 30 days.</li>
<li> Use a passphrase. Choose an easily remembered phrase like &#8220;Liberty and Justice Forever&#8221; and use the first one or two letters of each word with some punctuation and numbers in between. Example: Li.an1Ju*Fo.</li>
<li> Use a password pattern. Pick a starting point on the keyboard, trace out an easily remembered pattern, and add some twists. Example: The eight-character pattern 1qscvhU* describes a &#8220;V&#8221; on your keyboard starting with the number 1 key, with the added twists of an uppercase U and an asterisk.</li>
<li> Use a password manager.  If you use Firefox, for example, you can have your browser remember your passwords. Then be sure to <a title="Master password in Firefox" href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/05/08/how-to-use-a-master-password/" target="_blank">set a strong master password in Firefox</a> to protect your &#8220;remembered&#8221; passwords.</li>
<li> Other versatile, no-cost or low-cost password managers include<a title="Roboform" href="http://www.roboform.com/" target="_blank"> Roboform</a> and <a title="KeePass" href="http://keepass.info/">KeePass</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>This material is reprinted, with permission, from the February edition of the SANS Ouch!  newsletter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.paradigmcc.com/2010/02/23/answers-to-yesterdays-password-quiz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
